Exercising Action Inquiry and Mutual Power

by admin-sm on March 21, 2017

For more information and to reserve a seat now for one of our three 2017 Excercising Action Inquiry and Mutual Power Programs click on:

Exercising Action Inquiry and Mutual Power (a GLP certification program)

  •  supports your own and other leaders’ personal development (1st-person action inquiry)
  • cultivates your ability to support colleagues’ or clients’ or team development (2nd-person action inquiry)
  • introduces you to the capacity to lead organizational transformation (3rd-person action inquiry).

With the slide toward authoritarian government in parts of the world, including the United States, the question arises with more sharpness and urgency for many of us:

How to exercise vulnerable, alert, trust-building, mutually-and- organizationally-transforming power at work and at home?

The only statistically-validated answer is: through action inquiry.

With the ongoing translation of the book Action Inquiry into Japanese, German, Chinese, and Spanish… and
With the ongoing market opening

    • to the significance of vertical leadership development…
    •  to the importance of being able to measure leaders’ developmental action-logics validly through the Global Leadership Profile
    • and to how unique the Exercising AI program is:

the time is now

For more information and to reserve a seat now for one of our three 2017 Excercising Action Inquiry and Mutual Power Programs
click on:

To read about Bill Torbert’s leadership struggles when he first discovered action inquiry as a leadership practice during his directorship of the War on Poverty Yale Upward Bound program in 1966-68, click on Creating a Community of Inquiry. You can also find other Torbert publications newly added to our cyber library here.


Trumping Trump

by admin-sm on January 3, 2017

Trumping Trump by William Torbert ©

If developmental theory and the practice of Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry (CDAI) truly have practical value and transformational potential, then it must be important to know the center-of- gravity action-logic of the most powerful person in the world – namely, Donald Trump. And to learn something about how to trump him, if it comes to that.

People ask me what Donald Trump’s center-of- gravity action-logic is, and my response is Opportunist.

Then people say “How do you know? He hasn’t taken the Global Leadership Profile (GLP) has he?” No, he hasn’t. But one aim of CDAI is to learn how to make estimates of another’s action-logic based on that person’s behavioral patterns, using both prior research based on the GLP and one’s own clinical skills of interpretation in the field.

“Anyway,” they continue, “almost no managers you’ve ever measured – let alone anyone as successful as he is – score as Opportunists.” True enough.

“Isn’t Trump actually,” they conclude, “the epitome of an Achiever?” I agree that if one looks only at the monetary wealth he has accrued, Trump does look like an Achiever (although even here, the alternation between big profits and big losses in his different ventures, as well as the amount of short-term debt he carries looks more Opportunist than Achiever). Anyone who treats Trumps “Achiever-clothing” as his operating action-logic (and some of our Action Inquiry Fellows argue so) is in for a rough awakening. An Opportunist is far less conventional than an Achiever and will gladly eat your lunch.

If one looks at Trump’s daily behavior patterns, he sure looks like an Opportunist. He is famous for his short time span of attention, evident in his tweets, his inability to let others speak more than a sentence at a time in his presence (e.g. Mike Pence on “60 Minutes”), and his inability to develop coherent policy, let alone write his own autobiography. He is particularly famous for his flamboyant use of unilateral executive power, as in “You’re fired!” He focuses on concrete things (real estate, buildings, golf courses, “The Wall,” his name in gold). He rejects critical feedback out of hand, externalizing blame and mounting counter-attacks (such as law suits) until attention shifts to other issues. He exhibits hostile humor (e.g.mimicking a disabled journalist). He flouts sexuality and treats as legitimate “whatever one can get away with.”

He has been able to be as successful as he is for three main reasons: 1)because he started with a very large capital stake from his father, enabling him to afford law suits and punish enemies (whoever disagrees with him!) unilaterally from the outset; 2) because he “works all the time,” thus making “winning” a higher priority than anything (and anyone) else (does); and 3) because he’s never before been accountable to a boss, board or electorate. Now that he also has the most power of anyone in the world it’ll be harder than ever to beat him straight-on before the next presidential election.

Since, however, Trump thinks only tactically and his greatest skills are in catching others by surprise, he will unintentionally tend to create an increasingly dangerous set of network conflicts among companies, industries, government-
departments, and nations.

What is to be done? The public media may yet have their finest hours ahead of them. How to speak truth to power, indeed! Or better, how to speak and listen with love, with power, and with inquiry? Virtually no one knows how to interweavelove, power, and inquiry in action very well. May the professional media lead the way! David Brooke’s New York Times analysis on January 3 exemplifies such leadership (and is consistent with the analysis offered here).

Another whole sector that has the potential to model responsible action inquiry, based more on mutual power than on unilateral power is the Federal bureaucracy. Federal employees must beware to operate within current law and procedure. They should also know at what limit they are prepared to resign in as public a way as possible, and what their next steps will be if fired.

The public in general should be teaching itself how to create cultures of wonder (of collaborative inquiry and of mutually-transforming power) rather than cultures of hate (of blame and coercive power). Anyone can begin this learning process in their work teams, their families, and/or their friendship circles by devoting some proportion of their time (e.g. two hours per month) to developing cultures of wonder together and practicing how action inquiry can gradually dissolve cultures of hate. Also, members of the public who have never before participated in protest rallies or in non-violent civil disobedience should seriously consider these action inquiry avenues.

All of our worldwide Action Inquiry Associates activities in the calendar of 2017 events in the right hand column involve co-constructing cultures of wonder. Members of our Action Inquiry Fellowship devote 6 days a year to meeting together to wonder-in-action. We ask, how can we among ourselves generate timely interaction – the mutually-transforming power of love in the spirit of inquiry? And all of us devote most of our year to sharing our wonder-full practices with our clients or students.

In addition, many of us are now using the new TRANSFORMATIONS card deck for students or clients, so that they can make first-person self-diagnoses of their leadership action-logic; who can use the cards to tell their own story; and then to see how their self-diagnosis relates to their possibly ongoing leadership action-logic transformations, from the more unilateral earlier action-logics to the more mutual, later action-logics . The card deck is opening the way to doing this work in Africa and South America, China and Japan, not to mention larger audiences everywhere. See Transformations™ for global reports of using the TRANSFORMATIONS card deck and for its introductory 40% price cut.

At the same time, we also continue to offer the Global Leadership Profile (GLP) – the third-person measure of developmental action-logics with the most up-to-date reliability and validity testing. The basic book Action Inquiry: The Secret of Timely and Transforming Leadership appeared in Japanese in 2016 and is currently being translated into German, Russian, and Chinese. Also, Action Inquiry Fellowship members Hilary Bradbury and Bill Torbert published the critically praised Eros/Power: Love in the Spirit of Inquiry in 2016.

In 2017, may slow trump fast and may mutuality, if necessary, trump Trump.

Game on.


The Developmental Cafe: An Invitation to Global Webchats

October 3, 2016

Action Inquiry Associates, in partnership with AR+ ActionResearchPlus, invite you to join us in online developmental capacity building web-chats. Designed for change agents seeking to address the big (and related small) issues of our time, we seek to discuss and grow the “action logic” adult development paradigm for those of us who work with the […]

Read the full article →


March 21, 2016

In this blog entry and newsletter, I want to bring your attention to some potent new tools for practicing the exercise of mutual power. Mutual Power The theory and practice of Collaborative Developmental Action Inquiry claims, illustrates, and presents research data that support the notion that mutual power is more powerful than unilateral power. Unilateral […]

Read the full article →

Love in the Spirit of Inquiry

November 25, 2015

Dear Friends of Action Inquiry, In October, many of you have helped to make Action Inquiry Fellow Sophie Sabbage’s new book The Cancer Whisperer, an early Best Seller on Amazon. THANK YOU, FRIENDS, FOR YOUR SUPPORT!!! Good things are said to come in bunches, and now in November Amazon has brought out Eros/Power: Love in […]

Read the full article →

Action Inquiry Faces Incurable Cancer

October 3, 2015

Sophie Sabbage’s The Cancer Whisperer FREE Amazon Kindle downloads, October 6 and following days… Action Inquiry is just as significant for the development of lifelong friendships and for dealing with the great personal dilemmas and crises of our lives, as it is for successful leadership. In this regard, one of the members of our Action […]

Read the full article →


April 28, 2015

Two recently published books remind us of a word rarely heard in the contemporary world, especially in reference to leaders. The word is “character.” The two books are conservative columnist David Brooks’ The Road to Character and Fred Kiel’s research-based book Return to Character: The Real Reason Leaders and Their Companies Win. Brooks tells us […]

Read the full article →

“Vertical” vs. “Horizontal” Leadership Development

November 5, 2014

After years on the back burner, the distinction between more common types of horizontal, skills-based leadership development and increasingly necessary, vertical, capacity-developing experiences for leaders seems to be the new rage. White papers from the Center for Creative Leadership and the MetaIntegral Institute advocate vertical development (citing research based on AIA’s Global Leadership Profile). Old […]

Read the full article →

Power – Unilateral or Mutual?

April 3, 2014

Is the new Ukranian Prime Minister’s call for NATO and UN support in a successful, non-violent defense of Ukranian independence weak or powerful? Is President Jimmy Carter’s new book A Call to Action: Women, Religion, Violence, and Power one more whisper unheard in the jungle of politics, or does it point to the one issue […]

Read the full article →

Transforming the Transformers, Transforming Ourselves

September 25, 2013

We note that the wider world is yearning for alternatives to unilateral power in the efforts at collaborative action at this point in the Syrian war; in the anguish among Americans that our political parties are losing all capacity for productive dialogue, not only between Republicans and Democrats, but within each party as well. Moreover, […]

Read the full article →